Command Palette
Search for a command to run...
Matthew E. Peters; Mark Neumann; Mohit Iyyer; Matt Gardner; Christopher Clark; Kenton Lee; Luke Zettlemoyer

Abstract
We introduce a new type of deep contextualized word representation that models both (1) complex characteristics of word use (e.g., syntax and semantics), and (2) how these uses vary across linguistic contexts (i.e., to model polysemy). Our word vectors are learned functions of the internal states of a deep bidirectional language model (biLM), which is pre-trained on a large text corpus. We show that these representations can be easily added to existing models and significantly improve the state of the art across six challenging NLP problems, including question answering, textual entailment and sentiment analysis. We also present an analysis showing that exposing the deep internals of the pre-trained network is crucial, allowing downstream models to mix different types of semi-supervision signals.
Code Repositories
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Methodology | Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| citation-intent-classification-on-acl-arc | BiLSTM-Attention + ELMo | Macro-F1: 54.6 |
| conversational-response-selection-on-polyai | ELMO | 1-of-100 Accuracy: 19.3% |
| coreference-resolution-on-ontonotes | e2e-coref + ELMo | F1: 70.4 |
| named-entity-recognition-ner-on-conll-2003 | BiLSTM-CRF+ELMo | F1: 92.22 |
| named-entity-recognition-on-conll | BiLSTM-CRF+ELMo | F1: 93.42 |
| natural-language-inference-on-snli | ESIM + ELMo Ensemble | % Test Accuracy: 89.3 % Train Accuracy: 92.1 Parameters: 40m |
| natural-language-inference-on-snli | ESIM + ELMo | % Test Accuracy: 88.7 % Train Accuracy: 91.6 Parameters: 8.0m |
| question-answering-on-squad11 | BiDAF + Self Attention + ELMo (ensemble) | EM: 81.003 F1: 87.432 |
| question-answering-on-squad11 | BiDAF + Self Attention + ELMo (single model) | EM: 78.58 F1: 85.833 |
| question-answering-on-squad11-dev | BiDAF + Self Attention + ELMo | F1: 85.6 |
| question-answering-on-squad20 | BiDAF + Self Attention + ELMo (single model) | EM: 63.372 F1: 66.251 |
| semantic-role-labeling-on-ontonotes | He et al., 2017 + ELMo | F1: 84.6 |
| sentiment-analysis-on-sst-5-fine-grained | BCN+ELMo | Accuracy: 54.7 |
| task-1-grouping-on-ocw | ELMo (LARGE) | # Correct Groups: 55 ± 4 # Solved Walls: 0 ± 0 Adjusted Mutual Information (AMI): 14.5 ± .4 Adjusted Rand Index (ARI): 11.8 ± .4 Fowlkes Mallows Score (FMS): 29.5 ± .3 Wasserstein Distance (WD): 86.3 ± .6 |
| word-sense-disambiguation-on-supervised | ELMo | SemEval 2007: 62.2 SemEval 2013: 66.2 SemEval 2015: 71.3 Senseval 2: 71.6 Senseval 3: 69.6 |
Build AI with AI
From idea to launch — accelerate your AI development with free AI co-coding, out-of-the-box environment and best price of GPUs.