Command Palette
Search for a command to run...
Self-training and Pre-training are Complementary for Speech Recognition
Qiantong Xu Alexei Baevski Tatiana Likhomanenko Paden Tomasello Alexis Conneau Ronan Collobert Gabriel Synnaeve Michael Auli
Abstract
Self-training and unsupervised pre-training have emerged as effective approaches to improve speech recognition systems using unlabeled data. However, it is not clear whether they learn similar patterns or if they can be effectively combined. In this paper, we show that pseudo-labeling and pre-training with wav2vec 2.0 are complementary in a variety of labeled data setups. Using just 10 minutes of labeled data from Libri-light as well as 53k hours of unlabeled data from LibriVox achieves WERs of 3.0%/5.2% on the clean and other test sets of Librispeech - rivaling the best published systems trained on 960 hours of labeled data only a year ago. Training on all labeled data of Librispeech achieves WERs of 1.5%/3.1%.
Code Repositories
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Methodology | Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| speech-recognition-on-librispeech-test-clean | wav2vec_wav2letter | Word Error Rate (WER): 2.7 |
| speech-recognition-on-librispeech-test-clean | Conv + Transformer + wav2vec2.0 + pseudo labeling | Word Error Rate (WER): 1.5 |
| speech-recognition-on-librispeech-test-other | Conv + Transformer + wav2vec2.0 + pseudo labeling | Word Error Rate (WER): 3.1 |
| speech-recognition-on-librispeech-train-clean | wav2vec_wav2letter | Word Error Rate (WER): 2.8 |
| speech-recognition-on-librispeech-train-clean-1 | wav2vec_wav2letter | Word Error Rate (WER): 3.6 |
Build AI with AI
From idea to launch — accelerate your AI development with free AI co-coding, out-of-the-box environment and best price of GPUs.