HyperAIHyperAI

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

5 months ago

New Benchmarks for Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs

Derek Lim; Xiuyu Li; Felix Hohne; Ser-Nam Lim

New Benchmarks for Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs

Abstract

Much data with graph structures satisfy the principle of homophily, meaning that connected nodes tend to be similar with respect to a specific attribute. As such, ubiquitous datasets for graph machine learning tasks have generally been highly homophilous, rewarding methods that leverage homophily as an inductive bias. Recent work has pointed out this particular focus, as new non-homophilous datasets have been introduced and graph representation learning models better suited for low-homophily settings have been developed. However, these datasets are small and poorly suited to truly testing the effectiveness of new methods in non-homophilous settings. We present a series of improved graph datasets with node label relationships that do not satisfy the homophily principle. Along with this, we introduce a new measure of the presence or absence of homophily that is better suited than existing measures in different regimes. We benchmark a range of simple methods and graph neural networks across our proposed datasets, drawing new insights for further research. Data and codes can be found at https://github.com/CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks.

Code Repositories

Benchmarks

BenchmarkMethodologyMetrics
fraud-detection-on-yelp-fraudGAT+JK
AUC-ROC: 90.04
node-classification-on-geniusLINK 
Accuracy: 73.56 ± 0.14
node-classification-on-geniusL Prop 2-hop
Accuracy: 67.04 ± 0.20
node-classification-on-geniusL Prop 1-hop
Accuracy: 66.02 ± 0.16
node-classification-on-geniusGATJK
Accuracy: 56.70 ± 2.07
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-1MLP-2
1:1 Accuracy: 93.87 ± 3.33
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-6GCN+JK
1:1 Accuracy: 60.99±0.14
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-6LINK
1:1 Accuracy: 57.71±0.36
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-6LProp (2hop)
1:1 Accuracy: 56.96±0.26
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-6GAT+JK
1:1 Accuracy: 59.66±0.92
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-6MLP-2
1:1 Accuracy: 66.55±0.72
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-6L Prop (1hop)
1:1 Accuracy: 56.50±0.41
node-classification-on-penn94GATJK
Accuracy: 80.69 ± 0.36
node-classification-on-penn94L Prop 2-hop
Accuracy: 74.13 ± 0.46
node-classification-on-penn94GCNJK
Accuracy: 81.63 ± 0.54
node-classification-on-penn94L Prop 1-hop
Accuracy: 63.21 ± 0.39
node-classification-on-penn94LINK 
Accuracy: 80.79 ± 0.49
node-classification-on-penn94MLP
Accuracy: 73.61 ± 0.40
node-classification-on-yelpchiGAT+JK
AUC-ROC: 90.04

Build AI with AI

From idea to launch — accelerate your AI development with free AI co-coding, out-of-the-box environment and best price of GPUs.

AI Co-coding
Ready-to-use GPUs
Best Pricing
Get Started

Hyper Newsletters

Subscribe to our latest updates
We will deliver the latest updates of the week to your inbox at nine o'clock every Monday morning
Powered by MailChimp
New Benchmarks for Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs | Papers | HyperAI