HyperAIHyperAI

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

5 months ago

Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Processing Pipelines: A Showcase for Computation and Performance Trade-offs

Kanwal Neel ; Khoraminia Farbod ; Kiraz Umay ; Mosquera-Zamudio Andres ; Monteagudo Carlos ; Janssen Emiel A. M. ; Zuiverloon Tahlita C. M. ; Rong Chunmig ; Engan Kjersti

Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Processing
  Pipelines: A Showcase for Computation and Performance Trade-offs

Abstract

Histopathology is a gold standard for cancer diagnosis under a microscopicexamination. However, histological tissue processing procedures result inartifacts, which are ultimately transferred to the digitized version of glassslides, known as whole slide images (WSIs). Artifacts are diagnosticallyirrelevant areas and may result in wrong deep learning (DL) algorithmspredictions. Therefore, detecting and excluding artifacts in the computationalpathology (CPATH) system is essential for reliable automated diagnosis. In thispaper, we propose a mixture of experts (MoE) scheme for detecting five notableartifacts, including damaged tissue, blur, folded tissue, air bubbles, andhistologically irrelevant blood from WSIs. First, we train independent binaryDL models as experts to capture particular artifact morphology. Then, weensemble their predictions using a fusion mechanism. We apply probabilisticthresholding over the final probability distribution to improve the sensitivityof the MoE. We developed DL pipelines using two MoEs and two multiclass modelsof state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) and visiontransformers (ViTs). DCNNs-based MoE and ViTs-based MoE schemes outperformedsimpler multiclass models and were tested on datasets from different hospitalsand cancer types, where MoE using DCNNs yielded the best results. The proposedMoE yields 86.15% F1 and 97.93% sensitivity scores on unseen data, retainingless computational cost for inference than MoE using ViTs. This bestperformance of MoEs comes with relatively higher computational trade-offs thanmulticlass models. The proposed artifact detection pipeline will not onlyensure reliable CPATH predictions but may also provide quality control.

Benchmarks

BenchmarkMethodologyMetrics
artifact-detection-on-histoartifactsDCNN-based MoE
1:1 Accuracy: 97.82
Avg F1: 86.15
Recall/ Sensitivity: 97.93

Build AI with AI

From idea to launch — accelerate your AI development with free AI co-coding, out-of-the-box environment and best price of GPUs.

AI Co-coding
Ready-to-use GPUs
Best Pricing
Get Started

Hyper Newsletters

Subscribe to our latest updates
We will deliver the latest updates of the week to your inbox at nine o'clock every Monday morning
Powered by MailChimp
Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Processing Pipelines: A Showcase for Computation and Performance Trade-offs | Papers | HyperAI