HyperAIHyperAI

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

3 months ago

Impact of ECG Dataset Diversity on Generalization of CNN Model for Detecting QRS Complex

{Chandan Karmakar John Yearwood Ahsan Habib}

Abstract

Detection of QRS complexes in electrocardiogram (ECG) signal is crucial for automated cardiac diagnosis. Automated QRS detection has been a research topic for over three decades and several of the traditional QRS detection methods show acceptable detection accuracy, however, the applicability of these methods beyond their study-specific databases was not explored. The non-stationary nature of ECG and signal variance of intra and inter-patient recordings impose significant challenges on single QRS detectors to achieve reasonable performance. In real life, a promising QRS detector may be expected to achieve acceptable accuracy over diverse ECG recordings and, thus, investigation of the model's generalization capability is crucial. This paper investigates the generalization capability of convolutional neural network (CNN) based-models from intra (subject wise leave-one-out and five-fold cross validation) and inter-database (training with single and multiple databases) points-of-view over three publicly available ECG databases, namely MIT-BIH Arrhythmia, INCART, and QT. Leave-one-out test accuracy reports 99.22%, 97.13%, and 96.25% for these databases accordingly and inter-database tests report more than 90% accuracy with the single exception of INCART. The performance variation reveals the fact that a CNN model's generalization capability does not increase simply by adding more training samples, rather the inclusion of samples from a diverse range of subjects is necessary for reasonable QRS detection accuracy.

Benchmarks

BenchmarkMethodologyMetrics
qrs-complex-detection-on-incartCNN (MIT-BIH)
Accuracy: 91.65%
qrs-complex-detection-on-incartCNN (LOSO, Intra-Db)
Accuracy: 97.85%
qrs-complex-detection-on-incartCNN (MIT-BIH + QT)
Accuracy: 90.54%
qrs-complex-detection-on-incartCNN (QT)
Accuracy: 86.3%
qrs-complex-detection-on-mit-bih-arCNN (INCART + QT)
Accuracy: 97.5%
F1-score: -
qrs-complex-detection-on-mit-bih-arCNN (QT)
Accuracy: 96.6%
F1-score: -
qrs-complex-detection-on-mit-bih-arCNN (INCART)
Accuracy: 97.49%
F1-score: -
qrs-complex-detection-on-mit-bih-arCNN (LOSO, Intra-Db)
Accuracy: 99.60%
F1-score: -
qrs-complex-detection-on-qtCNN (INCART)
Accuracy: 94.39%
qrs-complex-detection-on-qtCNN (MIT-BIH)
Accuracy: 96.6%
qrs-complex-detection-on-qtCNN (MIT-BIH+INCART)
Accuracy: 94.48%
qrs-complex-detection-on-qtCNN (LOSO, Intra-Db)
Accuracy: 97.42%

Build AI with AI

From idea to launch — accelerate your AI development with free AI co-coding, out-of-the-box environment and best price of GPUs.

AI Co-coding
Ready-to-use GPUs
Best Pricing
Get Started

Hyper Newsletters

Subscribe to our latest updates
We will deliver the latest updates of the week to your inbox at nine o'clock every Monday morning
Powered by MailChimp
Impact of ECG Dataset Diversity on Generalization of CNN Model for Detecting QRS Complex | Papers | HyperAI