Command Palette
Search for a command to run...
Michal Lukasik Srinadh Bhojanapalli Aditya Krishna Menon Sanjiv Kumar
Abstract
Label smoothing is commonly used in training deep learning models, wherein one-hot training labels are mixed with uniform label vectors. Empirically, smoothing has been shown to improve both predictive performance and model calibration. In this paper, we study whether label smoothing is also effective as a means of coping with label noise. While label smoothing apparently amplifies this problem --- being equivalent to injecting symmetric noise to the labels --- we show how it relates to a general family of loss-correction techniques from the label noise literature. Building on this connection, we show that label smoothing is competitive with loss-correction under label noise. Further, we show that when distilling models from noisy data, label smoothing of the teacher is beneficial; this is in contrast to recent findings for noise-free problems, and sheds further light on settings where label smoothing is beneficial.
Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Methodology | Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| learning-with-noisy-labels-on-cifar-100n | Positive-LS | Accuracy (mean): 55.84 |
| learning-with-noisy-labels-on-cifar-10n | Positive-LS | Accuracy (mean): 91.57 |
| learning-with-noisy-labels-on-cifar-10n-1 | Positive-LS | Accuracy (mean): 89.80 |
| learning-with-noisy-labels-on-cifar-10n-2 | Positive-LS | Accuracy (mean): 89.35 |
| learning-with-noisy-labels-on-cifar-10n-3 | Positive-LS | Accuracy (mean): 89.82 |
| learning-with-noisy-labels-on-cifar-10n-worst | Positive-LS | Accuracy (mean): 82.76 |
Build AI with AI
From idea to launch — accelerate your AI development with free AI co-coding, out-of-the-box environment and best price of GPUs.