HyperAIHyperAI

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

3 months ago

Is Heterophily A Real Nightmare For Graph Neural Networks To Do Node Classification?

Sitao Luan Chenqing Hua Qincheng Lu Jiaqi Zhu Mingde Zhao Shuyuan Zhang Xiao-Wen Chang Doina Precup

Is Heterophily A Real Nightmare For Graph Neural Networks To Do Node Classification?

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) extend basic Neural Networks (NNs) by using the graph structures based on the relational inductive bias (homophily assumption). Though GNNs are believed to outperform NNs in real-world tasks, performance advantages of GNNs over graph-agnostic NNs seem not generally satisfactory. Heterophily has been considered as a main cause and numerous works have been put forward to address it. In this paper, we first show that not all cases of heterophily are harmful for GNNs with aggregation operation. Then, we propose new metrics based on a similarity matrix which considers the influence of both graph structure and input features on GNNs. The metrics demonstrate advantages over the commonly used homophily metrics by tests on synthetic graphs. From the metrics and the observations, we find some cases of harmful heterophily can be addressed by diversification operation. With this fact and knowledge of filterbanks, we propose the Adaptive Channel Mixing (ACM) framework to adaptively exploit aggregation, diversification and identity channels in each GNN layer to address harmful heterophily. We validate the ACM-augmented baselines with 10 real-world node classification tasks. They consistently achieve significant performance gain and exceed the state-of-the-art GNNs on most of the tasks without incurring significant computational burden.

Benchmarks

BenchmarkMethodologyMetrics
node-classification-on-citeseerACMII-Snowball-3
Accuracy: 81.56 ± 1.15
node-classification-on-citeseerACM-Snowball-2
Accuracy: 81.58 ± 1.23
node-classification-on-citeseerACM-GCN
Accuracy: 81.68 ± 0.97
node-classification-on-citeseerACMII-Snowball-2
Accuracy: 82.07 ± 1.04
node-classification-on-coraACMII-GCN
Accuracy: 88.95% ± 1.04%
node-classification-on-coraACMII-Snowball-3
Accuracy: 89.36% ± 1.26%
node-classification-on-coraACM-GCN
Accuracy: 88.62% ± 1.22%
node-classification-on-coraACM-Snowball-2
Accuracy: 88.83% ± 1.49%
node-classification-on-pubmedACM-GCN
Accuracy: 90.74 ± 0.5
node-classification-on-pubmedACMII-Snowball-3
Accuracy: 91.31 ± 0.6
node-classification-on-pubmedACMII-Snowball-2
Accuracy: 90.56 ± 0.39

Build AI with AI

From idea to launch — accelerate your AI development with free AI co-coding, out-of-the-box environment and best price of GPUs.

AI Co-coding
Ready-to-use GPUs
Best Pricing
Get Started

Hyper Newsletters

Subscribe to our latest updates
We will deliver the latest updates of the week to your inbox at nine o'clock every Monday morning
Powered by MailChimp
Is Heterophily A Real Nightmare For Graph Neural Networks To Do Node Classification? | Papers | HyperAI