HyperAIHyperAI

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

5 months ago

Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methods

Derek Lim; Felix Hohne; Xiuyu Li; Sijia Linda Huang; Vaishnavi Gupta; Omkar Bhalerao; Ser-Nam Lim

Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methods

Abstract

Many widely used datasets for graph machine learning tasks have generally been homophilous, where nodes with similar labels connect to each other. Recently, new Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been developed that move beyond the homophily regime; however, their evaluation has often been conducted on small graphs with limited application domains. We collect and introduce diverse non-homophilous datasets from a variety of application areas that have up to 384x more nodes and 1398x more edges than prior datasets. We further show that existing scalable graph learning and graph minibatching techniques lead to performance degradation on these non-homophilous datasets, thus highlighting the need for further work on scalable non-homophilous methods. To address these concerns, we introduce LINKX -- a strong simple method that admits straightforward minibatch training and inference. Extensive experimental results with representative simple methods and GNNs across our proposed datasets show that LINKX achieves state-of-the-art performance for learning on non-homophilous graphs. Our codes and data are available at https://github.com/CUAI/Non-Homophily-Large-Scale.

Code Repositories

CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks
pytorch
Mentioned in GitHub
cuai/non-homophily-large-scale
Official
pytorch
Mentioned in GitHub
kkhuang81/AdaptKry
pytorch
Mentioned in GitHub
ivam-he/chebnetii
pytorch
Mentioned in GitHub
kkhuang81/UniFilter
pytorch
Mentioned in GitHub

Benchmarks

BenchmarkMethodologyMetrics
node-classification-on-actorLINKX
Accuracy: 36.10 ± 1.55
node-classification-on-arxiv-yearLINKX
Accuracy: 56.00±1.34
node-classification-on-chameleonLINKX
Accuracy: 68.42 ± 1.38
node-classification-on-citeseer-48-32-20LINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 73.19 ± 0.99
node-classification-on-cora-48-32-20-fixedLINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 84.64 ± 1.13
node-classification-on-cornellLINKX
Accuracy: 77.84 ± 5.81
node-classification-on-geniusLINKX
Accuracy: 90.77 ± 0.27
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-10LINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 36.10 ± 1.55 
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-11LINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 68.42 ± 1.38 
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-12LINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 61.81 ± 1.80
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-13LINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 84.71 ± 0.52
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-13GCNJK
1:1 Accuracy: 81.63 ± 0.54
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-13L Prop 2-hop
1:1 Accuracy: 74.13 ± 0.46
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-13GATJK
1:1 Accuracy: 80.69 ± 0.36
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-13LINK 
1:1 Accuracy: 80.79 ± 0.49
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-13L Prop 1-hop
1:1 Accuracy: 63.21 ± 0.39
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-14GATJK
1:1 Accuracy: 56.70 ± 2.07
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-14MLP
1:1 Accuracy: 86.68 ± 0.09
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-14LINK 
1:1 Accuracy: 73.56 ± 0.14
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-14L Prop 2-hop
1:1 Accuracy: 67.04 ± 0.20
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-14GCNJK
1:1 Accuracy: 89.30 ± 0.19
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-14LINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 90.77 ± 0.27
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-14L Prop 1-hop
1:1 Accuracy: 66.02 ± 0.16
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-15MLP
1:1 Accuracy: 60.92 ± 0.07
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-15L Prop 1-hop
1:1 Accuracy: 62.77 ± 0.24
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-15GCNJK
1:1 Accuracy: 63.45 ± 0.22
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-15LINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 66.06 ± 0.19
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-15GATJK
1:1 Accuracy: 59.98 ± 2.87
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-15L Prop 2-hop
1:1 Accuracy: 63.88 ± 0.24
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-15LINK 
1:1 Accuracy: 64.85 ± 0.21
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-7LINKX
1:1 Accuracy:  77.84 ± 5.81 
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-8LINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 75.49 ± 5.72
node-classification-on-non-homophilic-9LINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 74.60 ± 8.37 
node-classification-on-penn94LINKX
Accuracy: 84.71 ± 0.52
node-classification-on-pokecLINKX
Accuracy: 82.04±0.07
node-classification-on-pubmed-48-32-20-fixedLINKX
1:1 Accuracy: 87.86 ± 0.77
node-classification-on-squirrelLINKX
Accuracy: 61.81 ± 1.80
node-classification-on-texasLINKX
Accuracy: 74.60 ± 8.37
node-classification-on-twitch-gamersLINKX
Accuracy: 66.06±0.19
node-classification-on-wiki-1LINKX
ACCURACY: 59.80±0.41
node-classification-on-wisconsinLINKX
Accuracy: 75.49 ± 5.72

Build AI with AI

From idea to launch — accelerate your AI development with free AI co-coding, out-of-the-box environment and best price of GPUs.

AI Co-coding
Ready-to-use GPUs
Best Pricing
Get Started

Hyper Newsletters

Subscribe to our latest updates
We will deliver the latest updates of the week to your inbox at nine o'clock every Monday morning
Powered by MailChimp
Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methods | Papers | HyperAI